Login Subscribe
    • Players/Parents
    • College Coaches
  • Choose Your State Middle School Coverage
    Alabama
    Arizona
    Arkansas
    California
    Colorado
    Dakotas
    Delaware
    Florida
    Georgia
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Maryland
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Nebraska
    Nevada
    New England
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    New York
    North Carolina
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    South Carolina
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wisconsin
  • Loading...
  • Tournaments
    • Prep Hoops Prep Hoops
    • Prep Hoops Next Prep Hoops Next
    Showcases
    • Freshman Showcase Freshman Showcase
    • Sophomore ID Camp Sophomore ID Camp
    • The Expo The Expo
    About Our Events
  • Prep Hoops for
    • Players
    • Parents
    • Club Coaches
    • High School Coaches
    • College Coaches
    • Fans
    View All Features
    • Player Profiles Build your own profile and join the Prep Hoops database.
    • Coverage Access Prep Hoops articles year-round without ads.
    • Rankings See how players stack up in each state.
    • Coach Views Get notified when a college coach views your profile.
    • Profile Trends Track your Player Profile views over time.
    • Recruiting Tasks Stay on-track in the recruiting process.
    • Recruiting Dashboard All your recruiting tools in a single place.
    • College Match Recommends colleges that match with your profile.
    • Coach Contacts Contact any program in the country.
    • Recruiting Tips Become an expert on the recruiting process.
    • Event Credits Save $25 on all Prep Hoops showcases.
    • College Email Templates Send customized emails directly to college coaches.
    • Scouts
    • How We Rank
    • Reviews
    • About Us
  • Iowa
  • Rankings
    • How We Rank

    • HS Power Rankings

    • Archived Rankings

    • 2026 Rankings

    • 2027 Rankings

    • 2028 Watch List

  • Teams
    • High Schools

    • Club Programs

  • Player Database
  • Scores
  • Scouts
  • Home
  • Coverage
      Choose Your State Middle School Coverage
      Alabama
      Arizona
      Arkansas
      California
      Colorado
      Dakotas
      Delaware
      Florida
      Georgia
      Idaho
      Illinois
      Indiana
      Iowa
      Kansas
      Kentucky
      Louisiana
      Maryland
      Michigan
      Minnesota
      Missouri
      Nebraska
      Nevada
      New England
      New Jersey
      New Mexico
      New York
      North Carolina
      Ohio
      Oklahoma
      Oregon
      Pennsylvania
      South Carolina
      Tennessee
      Texas
      Utah
      Virginia
      Washington
      West Virginia
      Wisconsin
  • Events
      Tournaments
      • Prep Hoops Prep Hoops
      • Prep Hoops Next Prep Hoops Next
      Showcases
      • Freshman Showcase Freshman Showcase
      • Sophomore ID Camp Sophomore ID Camp
      • The Expo The Expo
      About Our Events
  • Rankings
      Loading...
  • Features
      Prep Hoops for
      • Players
      • Parents
      • Club Coaches
      • High School Coaches
      • College Coaches
      • Fans
      View All Features
      • Player Profiles Build your own profile and join the Prep Hoops database.
      • Coverage Access Prep Hoops articles year-round without ads.
      • Rankings See how players stack up in each state.
      • Coach Views Get notified when a college coach views your profile.
      • Profile Trends Track your Player Profile views over time.
      • Recruiting Tasks Stay on-track in the recruiting process.
      • Recruiting Dashboard All your recruiting tools in a single place.
      • College Match Recommends colleges that match with your profile.
      • Coach Contacts Contact any program in the country.
      • Recruiting Tips Become an expert on the recruiting process.
      • Event Credits Save $25 on all Prep Hoops showcases.
      • College Email Templates Send customized emails directly to college coaches.
  • About Us
      • Scouts
      • How We Rank
      • Reviews
      • About Us
  • Support
Login Subscribe

Class 1A Substate Final Preview

Class 1A Substate Final Preview
Gladbrook-Reinbeck PG William Kiburis
Tony Roe
Tony Roe February 26, 2022 @ 12:15 PM
Facebook
X (Formerly Twitter)

In this article:

Jackson Wells
Jackson Wells 5'11" | PG | 2027
IA
Jack Wells
Jack Wells 6'0" | PG | 2027
IA
Klayton Van Dyke
Klayton Van Dyke 6'5" | PF | 2024
IA
Lane Harmon
Lane Harmon 6'1" | SF | 2023
IA
Josh Sanderson
Josh Sanderson 5'10" | PG | 2023
IA
Preston Gillespie
Preston Gillespie 6'3" | SF | 2023
IA
Drake Johnson
Drake Johnson 6'0" | SF | 2022
IA
Mason King
Mason King 5'10" | PG | 2023
IA
Caiden Gourley
Caiden Gourley 6'5" | SG | 2023
IA
Conner Maston
Conner Maston 6'1" | SG | 2023
IA
Cole Scheffler
Cole Scheffler 5'8" | PG | 2023
IA
Sawyer Nelson
Sawyer Nelson 6'6" | PF | 2022
IA
Braden Steel
Braden Steel 6'3" | PF | 2023
IA
Nash Smith
Nash Smith 6'6" | SF | 2023
IA
Jaxon Bunkers
Jaxon Bunkers 5'11" | SF | 2023
IA
Preston Rodibaugh
Preston Rodibaugh 6'3" | SG | 2023
IA
Casey Gardner
Casey Gardner 5'8" | PG | 2023
IA
Sage Evans
Sage Evans 6'2" | PF | 2023
IA
Tate Haughenbury
Tate Haughenbury 6'5" | PF | 2023
IA
Carter Sievers
Carter Sievers 6'1" | PG | 2023
IA
Koleson Evans
Koleson Evans 6'6" | SF | 2023
IA
Kyle Sternberg
Kyle Sternberg 6'4" | SG | 2023
IA
Brayden Lund
Brayden Lund 6'4" | SF | 2023
IA
William Kiburis
William Kiburis 6'4" | PG | 2023
IA
Colby Sieverding
Colby Sieverding 5'9" | PG | 2022
IA
Kaden Behrens
Kaden Behrens 6'1" | PF | 2022
IA
Tristen Sanford-Anders
Tristen Sanford-Anders 6'5" | PF | 2022
IA
Bennett Berger
Bennett Berger 6'2" | PG | 2022
IA
Wyatt Helming
Wyatt Helming 6'6" | SF | 2022
IA
Josh Baucum
Josh Baucum 6'1" | SG | 2022
IA
Daniel Tobiloba
Daniel Tobiloba 7'0" | C | 2023
IA
Ty Carr
Ty Carr 5'11" | PG | 2022
IA
Trey Jungers
Trey Jungers 5'11" | SF | 2022
IA
Cade Haughenbury
Cade Haughenbury 6'2" | SF | 2022
IA
Manny Hammonds
Manny Hammonds 6'2" | SG | 2022
IA
Dylan Kurt
Dylan Kurt 6'3" | SF | 2022
IA
Raydden Grobe
Raydden Grobe 6'2" | SF | 2022
IA
Austin Hilmer
Austin Hilmer 5'10" | PG | 2022
IA
<p><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Substate 1: Newell-Fonda (22-2) vs. Remsen, St. Mary’s (23-0)</strong></span><br /> <strong>at Sioux Center</strong></p> <p>We’ve got a fairly interesting contrast in styles in this game, as St. Mary’s loves to play strong defense and suffocate teams in the halfcourt with their athleticism, length, and physicality, while Newell-Fonda looks to speed the game up, force turnovers via the press, and get up as many shots as possible. The Mustangs average nearly 13 shot attempts per game more than the Hawks do, which is a good way to show the major difference in styles. St. Mary’s has held four of their last five opponents to 28 or fewer points and is allowing just 33.5 points a game on the season, while Newell-Fonda averages 74.3 points a game. The Hawks are looking for their sixth consecutive state tournament appearance and are led by junior wing [player_tooltip player_id="1167735" first="Jaxon" last="Bunkers"] (12.9), who leads a balanced attack that sees six players averaging at least 7.2 points a game. This team does an excellent job sharing the ball (18.0 assists), limiting turnovers (7.1), and scoring efficiently (55-43-63 shooting splits). Their balance makes them difficult to defend, and they have a ton of experience in big games. Newell-Fonda counters with junior wing [player_tooltip player_id="1167701" first="Carter" last="Sievers"] (19.6) and guard [player_tooltip player_id="962677" first="Trey" last="Jungers"] (12.5, 4.3 assists), who lead a potent offensive attack that loves to get up and down. The Mustangs average 15.0 steals a game, and thrive on their ability to get teams sped up and making poor decisions. That is easier said than done against this St. Mary’s team. The ’Stangs will be looking for some revenge after St. Mary’s ended their season last year, and this should be one of the best substate finals of the night.<br /> <strong>Our pick: Remsen, St. Mary’s</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> [caption id="attachment_1147247" align="alignright" width="300"]<a href="https://prephoops-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/ph/uploads/2021/03/Wyatt-Helming-crop-2786x1829-1615315103-crop-446x293-1615315117.jpg"><img class="wp-image-1147247 size-medium" src="https://prephoops-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/ph/uploads/2021/03/Wyatt-Helming-crop-2786x1829-1615315103-crop-446x293-1615315117-300x197.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="197" /></a> [player_tooltip player_id="1158420" first="Wyatt" last="Helming"][/caption] <p><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Substate 2: Lake Mills (23-1) vs. Dunkerton (22-3)</strong></span><br /> <strong>at Clear Lake</strong></p> <p>Dunkerton got revenge for a blowout regular-season loss to Newman Catholic to get to this substate final, and that Newman Catholic team beat Lake Mills late in the season as well by 13. The transitive property obviously doesn’t apply to basketball games, but it is something to note. These two teams have been absolutely dominant on both ends of the floor all year, with Dunkerton posting a +27.0 point differential, and Lake Mills owning a +30.9 differential. The Raiders are led by their dynamic junior tandem of wing [player_tooltip player_id="1367394" first="Preston" last="Gillespie"] (24.0, 7.9 rebounds, 62.7 FG%) and guard [player_tooltip player_id="1167715" first="Casey" last="Gardner"] (16.2, 9.1 assists). Gillespie recently set the school record for points in a season, and Gardner’s name is all over the record books for his assist totals. [player_tooltip player_id="1158505" first="Kaden" last="Behrens"] (14.1) provides some size and physicality in the paint, which will be crucial against a Lake Mills team that has some size. Senior forward [player_tooltip player_id="1158420" first="Wyatt" last="Helming"] (18.0, 9.7 rebounds, 3.2 blocks) leads the Bulldogs, a versatile 6-7 combo forward who can score inside and out and defend multiple positions. Expect him to get the first crack at Gillespie, but the ’Dogs do have a number of strong, lengthy options to throw at the Raiders’ star scorer. In what should be an excellent matchup with Gardner, [player_tooltip player_id="1158456" first="Bennett" last="Berger"] (14.0, 6.5 assists), who holds a better than 6-1 assist-to-turnover ratio leads the Lake Mills backcourt, while Denton Kingland (10.9, 39.3 3P%) provides some perimeter shooting. This one should be a ton of fun, but in the end, it’s the number of options that Lake Mills can throw at Dunkerton’s scorers that gives them the slight edge in what should be an outstanding high school basketball game. <br /> <strong>Our pick: Lake Mills</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> [caption id="attachment_1147251" align="alignright" width="300"]<a href="https://prephoops-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/ph/uploads/2021/03/Austin-Hilmer-new-crop-2786x1829-1615315146-crop-536x352-1615315160.jpg"><img class="wp-image-1147251 size-medium" src="https://prephoops-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/ph/uploads/2021/03/Austin-Hilmer-new-crop-2786x1829-1615315146-crop-536x352-1615315160-300x197.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="197" /></a> [player_tooltip player_id="682273" first="Austin" last="Hilmer"][/caption] <p><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Substate 3: North Linn (23-1) vs. Edgewood-Colesburg (21-3)</strong></span><br /> <strong>at West Delaware</strong></p> <p>These teams split their regular-season series, with Edgewood-Colesburg ending a massive Lynx winning streak with a 52-47 win before the holiday break, and the Lynx getting their revenge with a 61-47 win on January 29. In the first meeting, North Linn shot just 29.8% from the floor, 15-27 from the free-throw line, and got outrebounded 35-21. In the second matchup, they shot 48.8%, 14-24 from the stripe (still not great), and won the rebounding battle 29-22. The long and experienced Vikings from Ed-Co know that they have what it takes to beat the Lynx if they can follow their gameplan, limit turnovers, and pound the glass, taking advantage of their strength edge. If this gets into a running game, advantage Lynx. Ed-Co’s top eight scorers are all seniors, and this group has been building towards this year for a long time. Mason Ashline (13.8) and Jack Wiskus (10.7), a pair of big-bodied, physical wings, lead a balanced attack that pounds the offensive glass (12.8 a game) and forces turnovers (14.0 steals) with their length and athleticism. North Linn wants to run, run, and then run some more, while mixing in some traps along the way. The Lynx are led by senior point guard [player_tooltip player_id="682273" first="Austin" last="Hilmer"] (20.1, 8.0 assists, 4.4 steals), the quick focal point of their attack on both ends of the floor. [player_tooltip player_id="1167704" first="Tate" last="Haughenbury"] (15.5) and [player_tooltip player_id="962658" first="Cade" last="Haughenbury"] (10.8) are a pair of highly efficient forwards who benefit playing alongside the dynamic Hilmer, routinely getting easy looks at the rim, and [player_tooltip player_id="962641" first="Dylan" last="Kurt"] (13.4, 40.3 3P%) is the team’s top shooting threat. The Lynx are experienced in big games and are capable of hanging a 20-2 run on anyone in the state in the blink of an eye. Their experience and explosiveness leads them back to the state tournament, where they’ll be considered one of the top two favorites to take home the title. <br /> <strong>Our pick: North Linn</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> [caption id="attachment_1290446" align="alignright" width="300"]<a href="https://prephoops-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/ph/uploads/2021/09/54-William-Kiburis.jpg"><img class="wp-image-1290446 size-medium" src="https://prephoops-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/ph/uploads/2021/09/54-William-Kiburis-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a> [player_tooltip player_id="1167671" first="William" last="Kiburis"][/caption] <p><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Substate 4: Gladbrook-Reinbeck (23-1) vs. Bellevue (12-12)</strong></span><br /> <strong>at Clear Creek-Amana</strong></p> <p>One of these teams was expected to be in this game, the other was the fourth-seeded team in their district. But none of that matters on Saturday night, as one of these teams is 32 minutes away from a trip to the state tournament. Gladbrook-Reinbeck has rolled through their competition this season, winning games by an average of 24.0 points a game with their lone loss coming to Aplington-Parkersburg, one of the top teams in 2A. The Rebels are led by do-it-all junior point guard [player_tooltip player_id="1167671" first="William" last="Kiburis"] (21.7, 7.8 rebounds, 7.3 assists), a nightly triple-double threat who can dominate games even when he isn’t scoring. But he’s far from alone, with three others averaging in double-figures: [player_tooltip player_id="1158493" first="Tristen" last="Sanford-Anders"] (14.9, 9.2 rebounds), Caleb Egesdal (10.9, 43.7 3P%), and Luke Riffey (10.4). Sanford-Anders is a physical 6-4 forward who controls the glass and scores efficiently, while Egesdal and Riffey help space the floor with their shooting. Bellevue entered postseason play with a 9-12 record but have rattled off three straight wins, including upsets of Easton Valley and Springville. The Comets have gotten to this point behind the other-worldly play of junior guard Jensen Wedeking (12.0), who has been unstoppable in their three postseason wins, averaging 23.0 points on 52.9% shooting along with 8.7 rebounds. He was averaging 10.5 points a game coming into the playoffs, but has exploded under the bright lights. [player_tooltip player_id="1158506" first="Colby" last="Sieverding"] (13.2) is the team’s leading scorer, and Jackson Mueller (7.7, 7.8 rebounds) will need to keep Sanford-Anders off the glass if the Comets want to continue their magical run.<br /> <strong>Our pick: Gladbrook-Reinbeck</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> [caption id="attachment_1290563" align="alignright" width="300"]<a href="https://prephoops-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/ph/uploads/2021/09/152-Sawyer-Nelson.jpg"><img class="wp-image-1290563 size-medium" src="https://prephoops-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/ph/uploads/2021/09/152-Sawyer-Nelson-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a> [player_tooltip player_id="1235044" first="Sawyer" last="Nelson"][/caption] <p><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Substate 5: Danville (22-2) vs. WACO (20-4)</strong></span><br /> <strong>at Fairfield</strong></p> <p>While several of the other substate finals promise to be exciting, up-tempo affairs, expect this one to be an absolute grinder between a pair of defensive-minded teams that know each other very well. Danville swept the season series, taking 43-38 and 39-37 decisions about two weeks apart from each other. Danville comes in allowing 41.0 points a game, and WACO gives up 40.5 a night. Both teams pound the offensive glass hard (12.9 a game for WACO, 12.6 Danville), and force a ton of turnovers. This probably won’t be the prettiest game, but neither team will care about that, it’s all about punching the ticket to Des Moines. Danville is led by senior guards [player_tooltip player_id="1352966" first="Drake" last="Johnson"] (14.3) and [player_tooltip player_id="962692" first="Ty" last="Carr"] (8.6), forward [player_tooltip player_id="1235044" first="Sawyer" last="Nelson"] (10.0, 9.5 rebounds), and junior wing [player_tooltip player_id="1288859" first="Caiden" last="Gourley"] (13.9). Nelson and Carr were huge in their district final win over Winfield-Mt. Union, with Carr routinely knocking down big shots, and Nelson’s work as a rim protector and on the offensive glass proving to be vital contributions. Hunter Hughes (11.9), a sophomore guard who leads the Warriors in scoring, assists, and steals, is WACO’s top option, but they have a balanced attack with six others averaging between 4.0 and 9.8 points a game. The experience of Danville proved to be a difference-maker in the district final, and it may be the difference again here, as they’re led by three seniors, while WACO’s top six s comprised of three juniors and three sophomores. This should be tight, low-scoring, and physical, but we’ll side with the team that has the more experienced option in the backcourt as the deciding factor.<br /> <strong>Our pick: Danville</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Substate 6: Lynnville-Sully (18-6) vs. North Mahaska (19-5)</strong></span><br /> <strong>at Oskaloosa</strong></p> <p>These league rivals split their regular-season series, with North Mahaska winning 77-45 on December 10, and Lynnville-Sully getting revenge, 51-45, on January 28. In that second meeting, North Mahaska shot an uncharacteristic 29.3% from the floor, gave up 18 offensive rebounds, and was outscored 30-14 in the second half. It’s hard to imagine any of those three things happening again, which should give the edge to the Warhawks. They’re led by [player_tooltip player_id="1167743" first="Nash" last="Smith"] (20.4, 6.9 rebounds, 4.0 assists), a talented and long do-it-all wing who can score from all three levels, facilitate, and is a menace in their halfcourt trapping defense. [player_tooltip player_id="1367407" first="Lane" last="Harmon"] (14.2, 41.2 3P%) is a really good shooter who moves off the ball, and [player_tooltip player_id="1167746" first="Braden" last="Steel"] (9.6, 9.5 rebounds) is a force on the glass. Lynnville-Sully doesn’t have the firepower that the Warhawks do, but they do have balance, with four starters averaging between 9.4 and 13.7 points a game (and it would’ve been all five if [player_tooltip player_id="1167730" first="Preston" last="Rodibaugh"] wasn’t hurt). [player_tooltip player_id="1240095" first="Conner" last="Maston"] (13.7, 42.4 3P%) is the team’s leading scorer, but anyone can lead the team on a given night. They’ll need to get a big effort from [player_tooltip player_id="1376719" first="Klayton" last="Van Dyke"] (10.5, 9.5 rebounds) as a rim protector and in keeping Smith and Steel off the glass if the Hawks want to punch their ticket to the state tournament. Too much Smith on both ends of the floor, and for the first time in 16 years, the Warhawks are headed to Des Moines.<br /> <strong>Our pick: North Mahaska</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> [caption id="attachment_1147291" align="alignright" width="300"]<a href="https://prephoops-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/ph/uploads/2021/03/Manny-Hammonds-crop-2786x1829-1615315783-crop-507x333-1615315795.jpg"><img class="wp-image-1147291 size-medium" src="https://prephoops-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/ph/uploads/2021/03/Manny-Hammonds-crop-2786x1829-1615315783-crop-507x333-1615315795-300x197.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="197" /></a> [player_tooltip player_id="962674" first="Manny" last="Hammonds"][/caption] <p><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Substate 7: Grand View Christian (23-0) vs. St. Albert (12-11)</strong></span><br /> <strong>at Dowling Catholic</strong></p> <p>Grand View Christian has rolled through 1A competition this season, winning games by an average of 38.2 points a game behind a dynamic backcourt and dominant shot blocker on the defensive end. But they’ll have their work cut out for themselves against a St. Albert team that plays against primarily 3A schools during the season and really cuts their teeth against bigger teams. These teams met in last year’s substate final, a 67-65 Thunder win, and each of their three all-time meetings have been decided by single digits. The Thunder are led by their high-scoring senior backcourt of [player_tooltip player_id="962674" first="Manny" last="Hammonds"] (24.3) and [player_tooltip player_id="1141465" first="Josh" last="Baucum"] (19.3), a pair of guards who can fill it up in a hurry and force a ton of turnovers. [player_tooltip player_id="1367400" first="Josh" last="Sanderson"] (10.2, 6.2 assists) has been a good distributor and perimeter shooting threat, and junior big [player_tooltip player_id="956875" first="Daniel" last="Tobiloba"] (8.2, 14.3 rebounds, 4.6 blocks) is the ultimate eraser at the backend of the defense. St. Albert is led by a trio of double-figure scorers in Carter White (13.6), Colin Lillie (13.4), and DJ Weilage (12.2), and they do a pretty good job limiting turnovers, especially given the fact that they routinely play against bigger, more athletic schools. The size of Tobiloba in the paint is probably the difference-maker here, but this game will be a lot, lot closer than BC Moore’s 32-point spread.<br /> <strong>Our pick: Grand View Christian</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Substate 8: AHSTW (23-1) vs. West Harrison (21-3)</strong></span><br /> <strong>at Council Bluffs Jefferson</strong></p> <p>This promises to be a very exciting game between a pair of teams looking to make their first trip to the state tournament. AHSTW put together a really strong season last year and then dropped down to 1A this season. Their lone loss this season came by 5 against Grand View Christian. The Vikings are led by their dynamic trio of scorers in juniors [player_tooltip player_id="1167687" first="Brayden" last="Lund"] (18.3, 7.2 rebounds) and [player_tooltip player_id="1167692" first="Kyle" last="Sternberg"] (16.0), and senior [player_tooltip player_id="784987" first="Raydden" last="Grobe"] (18.0). All three of them shoot above 41% from behind the arc, can put the ball on the floor, and are long players who can score from all three levels. Junior point guard [player_tooltip player_id="1240070" first="Cole" last="Scheffler"] (4.1, 4.8 assists) is an excellent floor general who gets others involved at a high clip and limits turnovers. As a team, AHSTW turns it over just 8.3 times a game. West Harrison counters with their own "Big Three" of juniors [player_tooltip player_id="1288871" first="Mason" last="King"] (15.6, 45.1 3P%), [player_tooltip player_id="1167693" first="Koleson" last="Evans"] (14.4, 9.9 rebounds), and [player_tooltip player_id="1167703" first="Sage" last="Evans"] (13.6, 13.9 rebounds, 6.4 assists). The Hawkeyes are one of the best offensive rebounding teams in the state, pulling down 15.5 second chances a game. [player_tooltip player_id="1167703" first="Sage" last="Evans"] is an undersized forward but he plays with a relentless, non-stop motor and he gets others involved well. If AHSTW, which is bigger, is able to keep the Hawkeyes off the offensive glass, the Vikings should punch their first ticket to the state tournament. They’re the more dynamic team on both ends of the floor and have played a tougher schedule.<br /> <strong>Our pick: AHSTW</strong></p>
Prep Hoops

Access all of Prep Hoops

Continue reading this article and more.

Continue Reading
Already a subscriber? Log in

Rankings

299 Players Ranked

  • 1
    Colin Rice

    Colin Rice

    Waukee Northwest

    Nebraska
  • 2
    Jaidyn Coon

    Jaidyn Coon

    Storm Lake

    Creighton
  • 3
    Landon Davis

    Landon Davis

    Waukee Northwest

    Illinois
  • 4
    Navon Shabazz

    Navon Shabazz

    United Prep

  • 5
    Cael LaFrentz

    Cael LaFrentz

    Decorah

View Full Rankings

Related Articles

  • Preseason All-Conference Teams: Corner

    Preseason All-Conference Teams: Corner

    Tony Roe • September 3

  • Class 1A: Stars to Watch (Part 2)

    Class 1A: Stars to Watch (Part 2)

    Tony Roe • September 3

  • Class 1A: Stars to Watch (Part 1)

    Class 1A: Stars to Watch (Part 1)

    Tony Roe • September 2

  • Dynamic Duos in Class 3A

    Dynamic Duos in Class 3A

    Tony Roe • September 2

  • Preseason All-Conference Teams: Bluegrass

    Preseason All-Conference Teams: Bluegrass

    Tony Roe • September 1

Loading...
Home Iowa Class 1A Substate Final Preview

Prep Network

  • Prep Dig
  • Prep Girls Hoops
  • Prep Hoops
  • Prep Lacrosse
  • Prep Redzone
  • Prep Soccer
  • Prep Softball

Company

  • News
  • About
  • Careers
  • Store
  • Partner Interest Form

Resources

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Cookie Policy
  • Recruiting Tips
  • Student Loan Resources
  • College Scholarship Search

Support

  • My Account
  • Contact
  • Sitemap

© 2025 Prep Hoops. All rights reserved.