<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>With the season concluded, this group of programs proved they belonged in the conversation. Each made noise in their respective classifications, stacking wins, producing college-level talent, and in most cases, making postseason pushes that validated their ranking. Here's a closer look at how teams ranked 25–30 performed.<br></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>25. Fleming Island (23-9) | Class 5A</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Fleming Island put together one of the more complete seasons in North Florida, finishing with 23 wins and a deep playoff run that included a trip to the state semifinals. This group played with pace and physicality, showing the ability to separate from teams when shots were falling.The engine was junior wing <strong>[player_tooltip player_id='2397027' first='Carson' last='Crawford'] (17.2 PPG)</strong>, who continued his rise as one of the more intriguing 2027 prospects in the state. His ability to score in transition, rebound, and defend multiple positions gave Fleming Island a consistent advantage. This was a statement year for the program, proving they can compete on the state level.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>26. Bartow (24-6) | Class 6A</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Bartow had another strong season, finishing 24-6 and winning a district championship after taking down Lakeland twice late in the year. The Yellow Jackets leaned on toughness, guard play, and experience, consistently winning close games. Their postseason run showed resilience, though it ended against a talented Evans squad. This is one of the top programs with young depth to keep eyes on next year. Sophomores <strong>[player_tooltip player_id='2804162' first='Derwyn' last='Link'] and [player_tooltip player_id='2527379' first='James' last='Ratteree'] </strong>are both highly ranked in the state with many more developing on the roster. Bartow's identity stayed consistent all year — defend, execute, and rely on disciplined guard play. They remain one of the most reliable programs in Polk County year after year.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>27. Edgewater (18-10) | Class 7A</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Edgewater's record doesn't fully tell the story. Competing in one of the toughest classifications in the state, the Eagles battled through a demanding schedule and still found a way into the postseason. They picked up a key playoff win over East River before running into a tough matchup in the next round. <strong>Seniors [player_tooltip player_id='2415592' first='Jacari' last='Lofton'] and Dylan Foster</strong> are two of the top underrated Central Florida prospects. <strong>Junior [player_tooltip player_id='2396983' first='Julian' last='Fox'] (11.5 PPG) </strong>finished as a most improved candidate as he develops into a legit college prospect. Edgewater showed flashes of high-level play, especially when their athletes were active defensively and pushing tempo. This is a program that tested itself all year and should carry that experience forward.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>28. Palmetto (23-6) | Class 7A</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Palmetto quietly stacked wins all season, finishing 23-6 and establishing themselves as one of South Florida's more consistent teams. They played balanced basketball, with multiple scoring options and a defense that limited easy looks. Tough loss in the postseason, but they showed they could compete, like many in 7A, the margin for error was small. The Panthers have a junior core that could use this season as motivation in guard <strong>[player_tooltip player_id='2397099' first='Samfree' last='Sarante'] (18.3 PPG)</strong>, and forward <strong>Sebastian Madera (15.5 PPG & 7.5 rebounds)</strong>. Still, a 23-win season in that region speaks volumes. This is a team built on depth and discipline, and they delivered all year.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>29. Crossroad Academy (21-3) | Class 1A</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Crossroad Academy may not have had the same national spotlight, but a 21-3 record speaks for itself. What a season that ended with a huge win over Williston for the Rural state championship. They dominated much of their schedule and were one of the more efficient teams in Class 1A. Led by senior guards <strong>Jabari Boahen (13.1 PPG)</strong>, <strong>Camari Hale (11.6 PPG)</strong>, and forwards <strong>[player_tooltip player_id='2809440' first='Mason' last='Mobley'] (8.8 PPG</strong>, <strong>Trenton Jones (8.5 points, 8.1 rebounds)</strong>. Their success came from execution, discipline, and taking care of business against teams they were expected to beat. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><br><strong>30. Sarasota (25-7) | Class 7A</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Sarasota was one of the more productive teams in the state, winning 25 games and maintaining a strong presence throughout the season. Their offensive execution and ability to control tempo made them difficult to prepare for. Junior guard <strong>[player_tooltip player_id='2397029' first='Johnny' last='Lackaff'] </strong>finished as one of the top scorers in the state (23.6 PPG). Senior <strong>David Young</strong> was the anchor piece with (14.0 PPG) & (7.7 rebounds). They handled much of their schedule with consistency and carried that into the playoffs. Nearly took the state championship against one of the top consistent programs in Columbus in a three point loss. Sarasota proved they can win at a high level and compete with top-tier programs. A well-rounded group that maximized its strengths.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
With the season concluded, this group of programs proved they belonged in the conversation. Each made noise in their respective classifications, stacking wins, producing college-level talent, and in most cases, making postseason pushes that validated their ranking. Here's a closer look at how teams ranked 25–30 performed.
Continue reading this article and more.
Continue Reading
Already a subscriber?
Log in