<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>As we reset after the season, this tier of programs proved they could compete at a high level across different classifications. Here's how teams ranked 20–24 performed and what it means moving forward.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>20. North Broward Prep (24-4) | Class 3A</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>North Broward Prep put together one of the more efficient seasons in South Florida, finishing 24-4 and advancing to the regional semifinals. This was a veteran-led group that played with structure, spacing, and consistent scoring options.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>The senior trio of Francesco Borio (15.0 PPG), [player_tooltip player_id='2415600' first='Felix' last='Buroz'] (14.1 PPG), and [player_tooltip player_id='1660061' first='Samuel' last='Cano'] (10.3 PPG) carried the offensive load, each bringing a different element to the floor. Borio's scoring, Buroz's versatility, and Cano's steady production gave them balance. With that core graduating, the focus now shifts to younger players stepping into bigger roles.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>21. Impact Christian Academy (27-5) | Independent/National Schedule</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Impact Christian Academy quietly put together a strong 27-5 season while competing against a tough schedule in the Jacksonville area. Their run to the state semifinals showed their ability to handle pressure and win meaningful games.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>This group was led by a balanced senior backcourt — Ronald Clark (13.0 PPG), Frandy Perez (12.2 PPG), and [player_tooltip player_id='2401086' first='Jeremiah' last='Jones'] (11.8 PPG). They controlled tempo, shared scoring responsibilities, and kept the team steady throughout the year. With key seniors moving on, Impact still has a solid returning core that should keep them competitive.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>22. Lake Howell (25-6) | Class 6A</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Lake Howell was one of Central Florida's more consistent teams, finishing 25-6 and entering the postseason ranked inside the Top 20 statewide. They built momentum late and carried it into a deep playoff run before coming up short in the semifinals.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Sophomore guard Johnas Maurice (17.4 PPG) emerged as the engine, leading the team in scoring while also contributing as a playmaker and defender. Inside, [player_tooltip player_id='2522725' first='Isaac' last='Buckley'] provided toughness and rebounding, while Jaydon A. Samuels anchored the defense with rim protection. With key seniors graduating, Maurice's continued rise will be critical to sustaining success.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>23. Newberry (21-4) | Class 2A</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Newberry delivered a strong, disciplined season, finishing 21-4 and establishing themselves as one of the more consistent teams in their classification. Early in the year, they climbed to No. 5 in the Prep Zone Power Poll, fueled by defense and team cohesion.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Their third-place finish in the Kingdom of the Sun tournament highlighted their ability to compete with quality teams. While their season ended in the regional finals, this was still a significant year for the program, led by a senior class that set the tone on both ends.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>24. NSU University (23-6) | Class 3A</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>NSU University closed the season 23-6, showing balance and depth throughout the year. They were a team that could adapt to different styles — capable of scoring but also comfortable in slower, more physical games.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Senior [player_tooltip player_id='2425824' first='Sean' last='Jones'] (14.9 PPG) led the way as the primary scoring option, while [player_tooltip player_id='3557107' first='Ahmed' last='Mustapha'] (12.2 PPG) added versatility on the wing and [player_tooltip player_id='3551804' first='Justin' last='Rhodes'] (11.4 PPG) provided consistent production. Their ability to spread scoring across multiple players made them tough to scout. With a mix of returning pieces, this is a program that could take another step next season.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
As we reset after the season, this tier of programs proved they could compete at a high level across different classifications. Here's how teams ranked 20–24 performed and what it means moving forward.
Continue reading this article and more.
Continue Reading
Already a subscriber?
Log in